Barnett v. Patane

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina
DecidedDecember 23, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-00048
StatusUnknown

This text of Barnett v. Patane (Barnett v. Patane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. Patane, (W.D.N.C. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:19-cv-00048-MR

JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) PROTECTIVE ORDER ) JEFFREY DEAN PATANE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Consent Motion of Defendants Tamara Allen and Keisha O’Keefe’s for Entry of Protective Order [Doc. 51]. Defendants request the Court to enter a protective order authorizing and governing the production of confidential documents, material, and information (“Confidential Information”). Defendants relate that, “[d]uring the course of this litigation, Moving Defendants obtained and will continue to obtain and disclose to Plaintiff or the Court, information in the possession, custody, or control of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety (“NCDPS”) that is Confidential Information by operation of federal and state law.” [Id. at 1]. On review of Defendants’ motion, the Court finds that such information may be deemed confidential under federal and state law, including N.C.G.S.

§§ 126-22(3) and -24, § 122C-52, § 132-1.7, §§ 148-74 and -76; Goble v. Bounds, 13 N.C. App. 579, 581, 186 S.E.2d 638, 639, aff’d, 281 N.C. 307, 188 S.E.2d 347 (1972); Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197, 200 (4th Cir. 1979),

cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 (1979); 42 U.S.C. § 1320d et seq.; and 45 C.F.R. §§ 160-164. Due to the confidential nature of much of the information that will be produced in this matter, a protective order is necessary to authorize the

release of such confidential information and to ensure that such confidential information is not disclosed or used for any purpose except in connection with this litigation. Counsel for the co-Defendant and for Plaintiff, who is

appearing for the limited purpose of conducting discovery in this matter, have consented to the entry of a protective order. [Id. at 2]. The Court will, therefore, grant Defendants’ request for a protective order. The Motion [Doc. 51] is hereby GRANTED, and the Court enters the

following order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Scope of the Order. This Order applies to all information

produced during written discovery, including any discovery exchanged prior to the entry of this Order. 2. Use of Confidential Information. All Confidential Information, as

defined in this Order, shall be used solely in the prosecution or defense of this action, and shall not be used or disclosed by any person for any other purpose. 3. Disclosure. “Disclose” or “disclosure” means to provide, impart,

transmit, transfer, convey, publish, or otherwise make available. 4. Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” consists of “General Confidential Information” and “Attorneys’ Eyes Only

Confidential Information,” which are defined as follows: A. “General Confidential Information” refers to and includes: i. Information and documents contained in “personnel files,” as that phrase is defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 126-

22; ii. Information, documents, and related materials collected, created, and maintained by the Department pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 148-74, -76, -118.5; and § 122C-52;

iii. “Protected health information” as that phrase is defined in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103; iv. Other information that is potentially embarrassing or

invasive of the privacy of a person not a party to this litigation and therefore an appropriate subject of a protective order under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

B. “Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information” means: i. “Personally Identifiable Information,” as that phrase is defined in 45 C.F.R. § 75.2, of current or former

employees and contractors of the Department, including but not limited to dates of birth, social security numbers, home addresses and telephone numbers, insurance records or designations, medical and/or disability

information, and other purely private information; ii. The personal financial records, telephone records, and e-mail records of current or former employees and

contractors of the Department; and iii. Other non-public information as provided in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.7, which includes specific security

information or detailed plans, patterns, or practices associated with prison operations, such as certain investigations, security designations, staffing patterns

and logs, schematic or other drawings and diagrams, and other sensitive security information. 5. Disclosure of General Confidential Information. General Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to anyone except:

A. The Court and its personnel; B. The parties to this action; C. Counsel for the parties to this action and employees of said

counsel; D. Experts or consultants specifically retained by the parties or their attorneys to assist them in the preparation of this case or to serve as expert witnesses at the trial of this action, but only

after execution of a Confidentiality Agreement as provided in Paragraph 8; and E. Court reporters or videographers engaged to record

depositions, hearings, or the trial in this action. 6. Disclosure of Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information. Attorneys' Eyes Only Confidential Information shall not be

disclosed to anyone except: A. The Court and its personnel; B. Counsel for the parties to this action and employees of said

counsel; C. Experts or consultants specifically retained by the parties or their attorneys to assist them in the preparation of this case or to serve as expert witnesses at the trial of this action, but only

after execution of a Confidentiality Agreement as provided in Paragraph 8; and D. Court reporters or videographers engaged to record

depositions, hearings, or the trial in this action. 7. Withdrawal of Plaintiff’s Counsel. In the event that counsel for Plaintiff withdraws from representation and Plaintiff proceeds pro se, any Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information disclosed

to counsel for Plaintiff may not thereafter be disclosed to Plaintiff and shall instead be returned to defense counsel. The Court may allow Plaintiff to view Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential

Information only upon a motion for good cause shown. 8. Confidentiality Agreements. Before Confidential Information or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information is disclosed to any

person described in Paragraphs 5(d), 6(c), or 7, of this Order, counsel for the party disclosing the information shall inform the person to whom the disclosure is to be made that Confidential

Information shall be used only for the purpose of the prosecution or defense of this action, and shall obtain from the person to whom the disclosure is to be made a signed a copy of the Confidentiality Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel

for the party disclosing the Confidential Information to said person shall maintain the original Confidentiality Agreement and need not produce it except by agreement of the parties or upon

order of the Court. 9. Designation of Confidential Information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goble v. Bounds
188 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)
Goble v. Bounds
186 S.E.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barnett v. Patane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-patane-ncwd-2020.