Barnett v. Pan American Surety Co.

147 So. 2d 522
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 19, 1962·No. No. 31789·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 139 So.2d 192.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J.,. and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. Pan American Surety Co., 147 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1962).

147 So. 2d 522 (Barnett v. Pan American Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnett v. Pan American Surety Company
139 So. 2d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)