Barnett v. Melton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Barnett v. Melton

1932 OK 441, 13 P.2d 163, 158 Okla. 303, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 1025

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 7, 1932

Docket23415

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1932 OK 441 (Barnett v. Melton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnett v. Melton, 1932 OK 441, 13 P.2d 163, 158 Okla. 303, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 1025 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

CULLISON, J.

This case, No. 23415, wherein the plaintiff petitions the Supreme Court- for a writ ojfi prohibition against Harre L. Melton, district judgie of the fourth, judicial district of the state of Oklahoma, et al., to prohibit said parties from proceeding- t-o carry out a judgment rendered in cause No. 6-384, pending- in the district court of McIntosh county, Okla., in favor of the defendant, George Barnett, and against the plaintiff; and said cause No. 28307, pending herein, having- been finally determined upon appeal by this court, and the judgment of the trial court, in case No. 23307, 158 Okla. 270, 13 P. (2d) 104, having been affirmed by this- court favorable to defendant, we see no good reason why the writ of prohibition should issue to restrain the -district court of McIntosh county, Okla., from carrying out its judgment.

It. further appearing that defendants have-filed their motion to dismiss the application of plaintiff for a writ of prohibition, said motion is denied. The temporary order of this court made herein, staying proceedings to enforce collection of said judgment, is set aside and vacated. The petition for the writ of prohibition in case No. 23415 is denied.

CLARK, V. O. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and ANDREWS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULLISON, J.

This case, No. 23415, wherein the plaintiff petitions the Supreme Court- for a writ ojfi prohibition against Harre L. Melton, district judgie of the fourth, judicial district of the state of Oklahoma, et al., to prohibit said parties from proceeding- t-o carry out a judgment rendered in cause No. 6-384, pending- in the district court of McIntosh county, Okla., in favor of the defendant, George Barnett, and against the plaintiff; and said cause No. 28307, pending herein, having- been finally determined upon appeal by this court, and the judgment of the trial court, in case No. 23307, 158 Okla. 270, 13 P. (2d) 104, having been affirmed by this- court favorable to defendant, we see no good reason why the writ of prohibition should issue to restrain the -district court of McIntosh county, Okla., from carrying out its judgment.

It. further appearing that defendants have-filed their motion to dismiss the application of plaintiff for a writ of prohibition, said motion is denied. The temporary order of this court made herein, staying proceedings to enforce collection of said judgment, is set aside and vacated. The petition for the writ of prohibition in case No. 23415 is denied.

CLARK, V. O. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and ANDREWS, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK 441, 13 P.2d 163, 158 Okla. 303, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-melton-okla-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack