Barnett v. Melbourne Beach Supermarket, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
BRITTANY BARNETT,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:22-cv-1-ACC-GJK
MELBOURNE BEACH SUPERMARKET, INC. and BASHAR ZUBI,
Defendants.
ORDER This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Settlement (Doc. 12) filed on January 21, 2022. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motion be GRANTED. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that the parties have filed a Joint Notice of No Objection (Doc. 14), the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed January 27, 2022 (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Court finds that the settlement in this case is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions.' 3. The Motion for Settlement (Doc. 12) is hereby GRANTED. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 28, 2022.
ANNE C. CONWAY 7 United States District Judge
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
! See Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir. 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Melbourne Beach Supermarket, Inc. (Barnett v. Melbourne Beach Supermarket, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.