Barnett v. McCrea

27 N.Y.S. 820, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 820 (Barnett v. McCrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. McCrea, 27 N.Y.S. 820, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

MAYHAM, P. J.

Upon the facts found by the learned trial judge, which seem to be supported by the evidence, we think he reached a correct conclusion, and that the judgment should be affirmed upon the opinion at special term. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alleghany Corp. v. James Foundation of New York, Inc.
115 F. Supp. 282 (S.D. New York, 1953)
Meek v. Briggs
86 So. 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Roskam-Scott Co. v. Thomas
175 A.D. 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 N.Y.S. 820, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-mccrea-nysupct-1894.