Barnett v. McCrea

27 N.Y.S. 820, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MAYHAM, P. J.

Upon the facts found by the learned trial judge, which seem to be supported by the evidence, we think he reached a correct conclusion, and that the judgment should be affirmed upon the opinion at special term. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. McCrea, 27 N.Y.S. 820, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

27 N.Y.S. 820 (Barnett v. McCrea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alleghany Corp. v. James Foundation of New York, Inc.
115 F. Supp. 282 (S.D. New York, 1953)
Meek v. Briggs
86 So. 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Roskam-Scott Co. v. Thomas
175 A.D. 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)