Barnett v. Johnson
This text of Barnett v. Johnson (Barnett v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7125
LESTER BARNETT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES M. JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-298-1-1-MU)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 30, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lester Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lester Barnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Barnett v. Johnson, No. CA-01-298-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. July
15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barnett v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-johnson-ca4-2002.