Barnett v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Barnett v. Johnson

47 F. App'x 244

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2002·No. No. 02-7125·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lester Barnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnett v. Johnson, No. CA-01-298-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. July 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[245] terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lester Barnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnett v. Johnson, No. CA-01-298-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. July 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[245] terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barnett v. Johnson, 47 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

47 F. App'x 244 (Barnett v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related