Barnett v. Jewish Hospital of St. Louis
870 S.W.2d 253, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 231
Opinion
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in a malpractice case. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient and no error of law appears.
[254]*254An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, 870 S.W.2d 253, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 231 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
870 S.W.2d 253 (Barnett v. Jewish Hospital of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.