Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.
Opinion
Harley-Davidson Motor Company and its insurer, Trumbull Insurance Company, (collectively, Harley-Davidson) appeal from a Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) Final Award Allowing Compensation to Michael Barnett. In its sole point on appeal, Harley-Davidson argues that the Commission erred in its award because Barnett presented insufficient competent evidence to support a finding that an occupational exposure was the prevailing factor in causing his medical condition and disability. Because there was sufficient competent evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commission's finding of medical causation, we affirm the Commission's award. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
570 S.W.3d 166 (Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.