Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.

570 S.W.3d 166
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2019·No. WD 81801·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Harley-Davidson Motor Company and its insurer, Trumbull Insurance Company, (collectively, Harley-Davidson) appeal from a Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) Final Award Allowing Compensation to Michael Barnett. In its sole point on appeal, Harley-Davidson argues that the Commission erred in its award because Barnett presented insufficient competent evidence to support a finding that an occupational exposure was the prevailing factor in causing his medical condition and disability. Because there was sufficient competent evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commission's finding of medical causation, we affirm the Commission's award. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., 570 S.W.3d 166 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

570 S.W.3d 166 (Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.