Barnett v. Floyd County Nova Kola Bottling Co.

89 S.E. 490, 18 Ga. App. 413, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 378
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 11, 1916
Docket7135
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 490 (Barnett v. Floyd County Nova Kola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. Floyd County Nova Kola Bottling Co., 89 S.E. 490, 18 Ga. App. 413, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 378 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Beoyles, J.

X. Evidence that a letter was mailed to a given person does not authorize the presumption that he received it, unless the evidence shows also that the letter was properly addressed and duly stamped. Bankers Mutual Co. v. Peoples Bank, 127 Ga. 326 (56 S. E. 429), and cases therein cited. The evidence in this case showing merely that the defendant “mailed” the letter in question to the plaintiff, no presumption arose that the latter received it.

2. Under the facts of this case, the admission of testimony as to the insolvency of the plaintiff and of a judgment against it was not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The evidence authorized the judgment of the court, sitting without the intervention of a jury. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edmondson v. Air Service Company
180 S.E.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Burney
96 S.E. 578 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 490, 18 Ga. App. 413, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-floyd-county-nova-kola-bottling-co-gactapp-1916.