Barnett v. Craig

38 Ill. App. 96, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 275
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 27, 1889·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was one of several defendants in a suit before a justice of the peace on what purported to be their joint note, and filed a proper plea denying its execution. On appeal the Circuit Court defaulted him and rendered judgment thereon, without a trial by jury or any waiver thereof by him. This was error. Defendant in error has filed no brief here, and the judgment will be reversed for want of it, under the rule.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. Craig, 38 Ill. App. 96, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 275 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

38 Ill. App. 96 (Barnett v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Juenger
7 N.E.2d 376 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
North American Provision Co. v. Kinman
6 N.E.2d 235 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
Seron v. Carlson
280 Ill. App. 396 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1935)
Tongeln v. Knoll
227 Ill. App. 317 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Davies v. Apperson
146 Ill. App. 348 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1909)