Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Barnett v. Craig

Barnett v. Craig

38 Ill. App. 96, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 275
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 27, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 38 Ill. App. 96 (Barnett v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. Craig, 38 Ill. App. 96, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 275 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was one of several defendants in a suit before a justice of the peace on what purported to be their joint note, and filed a proper plea denying its execution. On appeal the Circuit Court defaulted him and rendered judgment thereon, without a trial by jury or any waiver thereof by him. This was error. Defendant in error has filed no brief here, and the judgment will be reversed for want of it, under the rule.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Juenger
7 N.E.2d 376 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
North American Provision Co. v. Kinman
6 N.E.2d 235 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
Seron v. Carlson
280 Ill. App. 396 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1935)
Tongeln v. Knoll
227 Ill. App. 317 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Davies v. Apperson
146 Ill. App. 348 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Ill. App. 96, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-craig-illappct-1889.