Barnett v. City of Elizabeth City
Opinion
A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us with tbe impression tbat tbe demurrer to tbe evidence was properly sustained, if not upon tbe principal issue of liability, Houston v. Monroe, 213 N. C., 788, [761]*761197 S. E., 571; Pace v. Charlotte, 221 N. C., 245, 19 S. E. (2d), 871, then for failure to give written notice of claim as required by tbe city charter. Trust Co. v. Asheville, 207 N. C., 162, 176 S. E., 257; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N. C., 363, 76 S. E., 228. In either event, the result is an affirmance of the judgment of nonsuit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
222 N.C. 760 (Barnett v. City of Elizabeth City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.