Barnett v. Amaker

198 N.C. 168
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 30, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The merits of the case turn upon the question of possession under color of title. There was ample evidence to support and justify the verdict, and therefore the finding of the jury is conclusive. The plaintiffs assail the charge of the court with respect to tacking and rely upon the case of Morrison v. Craven, 120 N. C., 327, 26 S. E., 940. However, this case is not applicable to the facts disclosed by the record. Vanderbilt v. Chapman, 172 N. C., 809, 90 S. E., 993.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. Amaker, 198 N.C. 168 (N.C. 1929).

198 N.C. 168 (Barnett v. Amaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lofton v. . Barber
39 S.E.2d 263 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)