Barnett Customs Brokers, Inc. v. United States
This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 700 (Barnett Customs Brokers, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of a so-called “Belt Pinning Machine/' imported from England and entered at the port of Los Angeles.
At the trial, the case was submitted on the following stipulation, as entered into between counsel for the respective parties:
Mb. Vitale: The Government is willing to stipulate with Mr. Wilkinson, representing the plaintiff in this case, that the merchandise involved was appraised on a statutory basis of cost of production, and that since the appraisement, or the Appraiser has determined that an error was made by the Appraiser, he now believes that the correct appraised value should be on that cost of production basis, at 1,049 pounds 5 shillings and 3 pence net packed, as provided in Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
Are you willing to so agree, Mr. Wilkinson?
Me. Wilkinson: I am.
On the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. O. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the merchandise here involved, and that said value is 1,049 pounds, 5 shillings, and 3 pence, net, packed.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Cust. Ct. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-customs-brokers-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1958.