Barnett (Corey) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 2022·No. 84747·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

COREY THOMAS BARNETT, A/K/A No. 84747 CORRY THOMAS BARNETT,

Appellant, FILED vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, JUN 0 6 2022 Respondent. ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK9FpyPREME COURT BY

DEPUTYtERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court minute order denying a motion for an order to void judgment. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from such an order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for an appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

, J.

Stiglich Herndon

cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Corey Thomas Barnett Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney SUPREME COURT Eighth District Court Clerk OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A dtaDD

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett (Corey) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

Barnett (Corey) v. State (Barnett (Corey) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)