Barnett Bank of St. Lucie County v. Garrett
468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1985·No. Nos. 84-1429, 84-1493·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appellant correctly asserts that the trial judge erred when he entered an order granting appellee’s motion for leave to file a counterclaim, simultaneously with his order of recusal. See Weiner v. Weiner, 416 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order dated June 28, 1984 which granted appel-lee’s motion for leave to file a counterclaim.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett Bank of St. Lucie County v. Garrett, 468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
468 So. 2d 467 (Barnett Bank of St. Lucie County v. Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lance Block, P.A. v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
85 So. 3d 1122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Barnett Bank of South Florida, NA v. Tarr
557 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Stimpson Computing Scale Co. v. Knuck
508 So. 2d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)