Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc.

422 So. 2d 349, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21700

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 1982·No. No. 82-292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice its fourth amended complaint. Appellant, Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A., in its complaint only sought foreclosure of a mortgage given by the appellee, Florida Free Enterprises, Inc., and did not allege a cause of action on the promissory note executed by the appellee on July 5, 1973. We accordingly affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the foreclosure action without prejudice to appellant’s filing an action on the promissory note.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice its fourth amended complaint. Appellant, Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A., in its complaint only sought foreclosure of a mortgage given by the appellee, Florida Free Enterprises, Inc., and did not allege a cause of action on the promissory note executed by the appellee on July 5, 1973. We accordingly affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the foreclosure action without prejudice to appellant’s filing an action on the promissory note.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc., 422 So. 2d 349, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

422 So. 2d 349 (Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related