Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc.

422 So. 2d 349, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21700

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 1982

DocketNo. 82-292

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 349 (Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A. v. Florida Free Enterprises, Inc., 422 So. 2d 349, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice its fourth amended complaint. Appellant, Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A., in its complaint only sought foreclosure of a mortgage given by the appellee, Florida Free Enterprises, Inc., and did not allege a cause of action on the promissory note executed by the appellee on July 5, 1973. We accordingly affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the foreclosure action without prejudice to appellant’s filing an action on the promissory note.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice its fourth amended complaint. Appellant, Barnett Bank of Orlando/Winter Park, N.A., in its complaint only sought foreclosure of a mortgage given by the appellee, Florida Free Enterprises, Inc., and did not allege a cause of action on the promissory note executed by the appellee on July 5, 1973. We accordingly affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the foreclosure action without prejudice to appellant’s filing an action on the promissory note.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 So. 2d 349, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-bank-of-orlandowinter-park-na-v-florida-free-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack