Barnet v. Hope
5 Binn. 518, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 29
This text of 5 Binn. 518 (Barnet v. Hope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barnet v. Hope, 5 Binn. 518, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 29 (Pa. 1813).
Opinion
The Court are of opinion that the proceedings under the second rule were irregular. The plaintiff having acted under the first rule, could not enter a second until the first was discharged by order of the Court. Let the rule.be made absolute.
Rule absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Binn. 518, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnet-v-hope-pa-1813.