Barnet v. Haines

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Barnet v. Haines

77 A. 1133, 106 Me. 552, 1910 Me. LEXIS 39

DecidedJanuary 29, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A. 1133 (Barnet v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnet v. Haines, 77 A. 1133, 106 Me. 552, 1910 Me. LEXIS 39 (Me. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Assumpsit against the defendant as guarantor of a debt due from the Oakland Woolen Company to the plaintiffs. The question was whether the guaranty covered only those accounts due, and certain other goods ordered but not delivered prior to the date when the written guaranty was given July 8, 1908, or whether it was a continuing guaranty and covered also goods sold and delivered subsequent to that date. Reported to the Law Court. Held to be a continuing guaranty. Judgment for plaintiffs for $2,857.11 with interest from date of writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit against the defendant as guarantor of a debt due from the Oakland Woolen Company to the plaintiffs. The question was whether the guaranty covered only those accounts due, and certain other goods ordered but not delivered prior to the date when the written guaranty was given July 8, 1908, or whether it was a continuing guaranty and covered also goods sold and delivered subsequent to that date. Reported to the Law Court. Held to be a continuing guaranty. Judgment for plaintiffs for $2,857.11 with interest from date of writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A. 1133, 106 Me. 552, 1910 Me. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnet-v-haines-me-1910.