Barnes v. Wakeman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Barnes v. Wakeman

76 P. 1128, 69 Kan. 853, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 357

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 7, 1904

DocketNo. 13,640

StatusPublished

This text of 76 P. 1128 (Barnes v. Wakeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. Wakeman, 76 P. 1128, 69 Kan. 853, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 357 (kan 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The will executed by Curtis P. Casey was contested. It was found by the jury that he was not of sound mind and memory when the will was made and that it was not legally executed and attested. The court approved these findings, and also found and declared that the will was void. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings is the only question presented for review.

’ A reading of the testimony in the record satisfies us that it amply sustained the findings, and, hence, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The will executed by Curtis P. Casey was contested. It was found by the jury that he was not of sound mind and memory when the will was made and that it was not legally executed and attested. The court approved these findings, and also found and declared that the will was void. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings is the only question presented for review.

’ A reading of the testimony in the record satisfies us that it amply sustained the findings, and, hence, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 P. 1128, 69 Kan. 853, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-wakeman-kan-1904.