Barnes v. United States

61 F. App'x 690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 2003
DocketNos. 02-5077, 02-5093
StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. App'x 690 (Barnes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. United States, 61 F. App'x 690 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Opinion

LINN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded.

On October 17, 2002, we remanded to the trial court for the purpose of allowing Barnes to file a motion for clarification because it was not clear that a final judgment had been issued as to all claims and all plaintiffs. On January 22, 2003, the trial court responded that a final judgment had not yet been issued and thus requested that this court dismiss Barnes’ appeal and remand to the trial court. Because the trial court has not issued a final judgment, we agree that it is appropriate to remand.

Barnes also requests that the court relieve him from the requirement of filing periodic status reports. In light of our decision to remand, Barnes need not file additional status reports.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Barnes’ unopposed motion to remand is granted.

(2) All other pending motions are moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F. App'x 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-united-states-cafc-2003.