Barnes v. Triplett

1 Ky. Op. 397, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 351
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 3, 1866
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ky. Op. 397 (Barnes v. Triplett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. Triplett, 1 Ky. Op. 397, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 351 (Ky. Ct. App. 1866).

Opinion

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

There' were but two witnesses sworn in the case, Tesler and Hoffman, and their evidence does not conflict, but is consistent and harmonious. Hoffman corroborates Tesler as far as the latter deposes.

[398]*398If the jury gave credit to Hoffman their verdict should have-been for the defendants; if they did not, then the plaintiff had not sustained his right of action by evidence, and the jury should have found against him.

In any view of this evidence, the jury should have found for appellants, and because they found for appellee the court should have awarded a new trial.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions to award a new trial, .and for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ky. Op. 397, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-triplett-kyctapp-1866.