Barnes v. The City of New York
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- X TOMMY BARNES, : Petitioner/Plaintiff, : : 18 Civ. 7119 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER CHRISTOPHER YEHL et al., : Respondent/Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on November 17, 2025, Petitioner filed an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (the “Habeas Petition”). Dkt. 199. The Habeas Petition is pending. WHEREAS, the Order dated March 4, 2026, set Respondent Yehl’s deadline to answer the Habeas Petition to March 23, 2026, and Petitioner’s deadline to reply thirty days from the date of service of the response. Dkt. 219. WHEREAS, on March 19, 2026, Respondent filed a response to the Habeas Petition and a certificate of service. Dkts. 220, 221 and 222. Because the certificate of service contained a typographical error, Respondent was ordered to refile it. Dkt. 223. Respondent filed a corrected certificate of service on March 24, 2026. Dkt. 225. WHEREAS, the Order dated April 23, 2026, reminded Petitioner that his deadline to file a reply regarding the Habeas Petition was April 24, 2026. Dkt. 227. WHEREAS, Petitioner has not filed a reply to date. It is hereby ORDERED that by May 29, 2026, Petitioner shall file a letter stating whether he intends to file a reply in support of the Habeas Petition or waive his opportunity to do so. If Petitioner intends to file a reply, he shall state a date certain, which shall be no later than June 26, 2026, by which he will file the reply. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Dated: May 21, 2026 New York, New York .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnes v. The City of New York (Barnes v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.