Barnes v. Thames
This text of 577 So. 2d 1009 (Barnes v. Thames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mona BARNES, Individually and as the Curator of the Interdict Daniel J. White
v.
Charles W. THAMES, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Reliance Insurance Company. (Two Cases)
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied.
MARCUS, J., would grant, being of the opinion that the trial judge erred in awarding interest on the sum over and above the amount of the judgment against Aetna and being further of the opinion that the judge erred in granting interest on penalties and attorney fees from date of judicial demand rather than from date of judgment in contravention of this Court's decision in Alexander v. Burroughs Corp., 359 So.2d 607, 614 (La.1978).
LEMMON, J., would grant the writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
577 So. 2d 1009, 1991 WL 63787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-thames-la-1991.