Barnes v. Stoughton

New York Supreme Court

Barnes v. Stoughton

2 Thomp. & Cook 675

DecidedMarch 15, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Thomp. & Cook 675 (Barnes v. Stoughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. Stoughton, 2 Thomp. & Cook 675 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Tappen, J.

The premises had, under the judgment of foreclosure, been sold three times, and the sale opened twice. Epon the third sale the manner of sale was agreed upon by all parties. The opinion is chiefly devoted to a consideration of facts, and the judgment of the special term was affirmed on the ground that such facts did not warrant an opening of the sale. The head-note gives all of value for publication.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tappen, J.

The premises had, under the judgment of foreclosure, been sold three times, and the sale opened twice. Epon the third sale the manner of sale was agreed upon by all parties. The opinion is chiefly devoted to a consideration of facts, and the judgment of the special term was affirmed on the ground that such facts did not warrant an opening of the sale. The head-note gives all of value for publication.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Thomp. & Cook 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-stoughton-nysupct-1874.