Barnes v. State

1918 OK CR 175, 176 P. 83, 15 Okla. Crim. 265, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 61
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 30, 1918
DocketNo. A-3117.
StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK CR 175 (Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. State, 1918 OK CR 175, 176 P. 83, 15 Okla. Crim. 265, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 61 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the county court of Okmulgee county, in which court the defendant was convicted of the crime of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of six months and to pay a fine of $500.

The evidence discloses that the defendant, together with other persons, conveyed by automobile about 120 *266 quart bottles of whisky from a place where the same had been stored about five miles north of the city of Okmulgee in Okmulgee county, Okla., to the residence of a negro named Sam Simpson, located in the city of Okmulgee.

The co'nviction of the defendant was based largely upon the testimony of an accomplice, who assisted in hauling the liquor, but the testimony of the accomplice is sufficiently corroborated by other competent evidence, which tends clearly to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime, and this, taken in connection with the accomplice’s testimony, is sufficient to sustain the conviction. This case was set for submission at the November, 1918. term of this court, the appeal having been docketed on August 17, 1917. No brief has been filed in behalf of the defendant, nor did any counsel representing him appear to orally argue the case at the time of its submission. The case was submitted on a motion of the Attorney General to affirm the same for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal.

The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for said reason is sustained, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1918 OK CR 175, 176 P. 83, 15 Okla. Crim. 265, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.