Barnes v. State
This text of 31 S.E. 561 (Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An affidavit attached to a petition for certiorari to review the judgment of a county court in a criminal ease, in which the affiant makes oath that, “owing to his poverty, he is unable to pay the cost or give the bond and security as required by law,” substantially complies with the requirements of section 765 of the Penal Code, notwithstanding such affidavit includes the words relating to the giving of bond and security. This is so because the affidavit unequivocally sets forth the inability of affiant to pay the cost, and does not state conjunctively his inability to give the bond.
2. The ruling made in the case of DeLoach v. Richards, 94 Ga. 730, is not in conflict with what is here held. That case is incorrectly reported. The record shows that the affidavit conjunctively' stated that the affiant was unable to pay the cost and give security, etc. A similar reference has heretofore been made to the case. Flanagan v. Scott, 102 Ga. 399.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 S.E. 561, 105 Ga. 830, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-state-ga-1898.