Barnes v. State

915 So. 2d 635, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15533, 2005 WL 2398536
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barnes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 868 So. 2d 606
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 2005·No. No. 2D04-3348·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cinque Akeem Barnes appeals the denial of his postconviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his postconviction motion, Barnes raised three claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court issued an order requiring the State to respond to Barnes’ first claim but did not address Barnes’ second or third claim. In its response, the State conceded that an evidentiary hearing was necessary to resolve Barnes’ first claim. After an evidentiary hearing, the [636]*636trial court entered its order denying post-conviction relief. We affirm without discussion the denial of postconviction relief as to Barnes’ first claim. However, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the two additional claims in compliance with rule 3.850.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

STRINGER, KELLY, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. State, 915 So. 2d 635, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15533, 2005 WL 2398536 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

915 So. 2d 635 (Barnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.