Barnes v. State

92 So. 15, 18 Ala. App. 344, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 62
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 1922·No. 5 Div. 382.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

[1] The motion to strike defendant’s plea was properly grantéd. Powell v. State, ante, p. 101, 90 South. 138.

[2-4] Defendant’s demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Taylor v. State, 17 Ala. App. 579, 88 South. 205.

[5] There was evidence tending to prove the state’s case and therefore the general •charge as requested by the defendant was properly refused.

[6] The carrying of wood to the still for the purpose of making whisky, was aiding or abetting, and hence charge 7 was properly refused.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. State, 92 So. 15, 18 Ala. App. 344, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 62 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

92 So. 15 (Barnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Largin v. State
104 So. 556 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Aldridge v. State
102 So. 785 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Bedgood v. State
97 So. 250 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
McKenzie v. State
97 So. 155 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Bishop v. State
97 So. 169 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Wells v. State
97 So. 681 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)