Barnes v. State

92 So. 15, 18 Ala. App. 344, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 62
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 10, 1922
Docket5 Div. 382.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 92 So. 15 (Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. State, 92 So. 15, 18 Ala. App. 344, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 62 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

[1] The motion to strike defendant’s plea was properly grantéd. Powell v. State, ante, p. 101, 90 South. 138.

[2-4] Defendant’s demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Taylor v. State, 17 Ala. App. 579, 88 South. 205.

[5] There was evidence tending to prove the state’s case and therefore the general •charge as requested by the defendant was properly refused.

[6] The carrying of wood to the still for the purpose of making whisky, was aiding or abetting, and hence charge 7 was properly refused.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Largin v. State
104 So. 556 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Aldridge v. State
102 So. 785 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Bedgood v. State
97 So. 250 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
McKenzie v. State
97 So. 155 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Bishop v. State
97 So. 169 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Wells v. State
97 So. 681 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 15, 18 Ala. App. 344, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-state-alactapp-1922.