Barnes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Barnes v. State

641 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 392, 1993 WL 143790

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMay 7, 1993

DocketCR-91-1735

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 641 So. 2d 1253 (Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. State, 641 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 392, 1993 WL 143790 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

MONTIEL, Judge.

Secdrick Jremayne Barnes appeals from the revocation of his probation. The trial court’s order of revocation did not include the reasons for and the evidence relied on in revoking Barnes’s probation as required by Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973) and Rule 27.6(f), A.R.Crim.P. Therefore, we must remand this cause to the trial court.

Although the appellant did not make an objection on this ground, we cannot procedurally bar this issue. Ex Parte Helton, 578 So.2d 1379 (Ala.1990); Taylor v. State, 600 So.2d 1080 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). This cause is remanded to the trial court so that he may provide this court with the reasons and the evidence relied on in revoking the appellant’s probation. A return to remand shall be filed with this court in 60 days.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI