Barnes v. Snyder

126 S.E. 863, 33 Ga. App. 501, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 546
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 24, 1925
Docket15318
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 126 S.E. 863 (Barnes v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. Snyder, 126 S.E. 863, 33 Ga. App. 501, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A judgment against a bankrupt at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, notwithstanding there may be pending proceedings on appeal to set it aside, is, as provided in section 63(a) of the bankruptcy act, a fixed liability which may be proved and allowed in bankruptcy. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (13th ed.), 1387-9, and eases there cited.

2. A lien arising by virtue of service of summons of garnishment issued upon a suit instituted against an insolvent defendant within four months prior to the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or against the defendant, who was adjudged a bankrupt, is, under section 67, subsections c and f, null and void, since the existence and enforcement of such a lien by the plaintiff would work a preference. Where such garnishment has been dissolved and the fund received by the defendant, who is the principal on the dissolution bond, he may nevertheless obtain a perpetual stay of a judgment against him in behalf of the plaintiff upon the bond. See, in this connection, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (13th ed.), 1581; Alvaton Mercantile Co. v. Caldiwll, 156 Ga. 317 (119 S. E. 25); National Surety Co. v. Medlock, 2 Ga. App. 665 (58 S. E. 1131); Morris Fertilizer Co. v. Jackson, 27 Ga. App. 567 (110 S. E. 219); Garden v. Crutchfield, 112 Ga. 274 (37 S. E. 368).

3. The foregoing facts being established without issue, the superior-court judge did not err in sustaining the certiorari brought by the defendant, excepting to a judgment of the municipal court denying a motion to stay the proceedings against the defendant on the dissolution bond.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur. Leo Budderth, H. C. Holbrook, for pMntiff in error. James L. & Will Q. Moore, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roquemore v. Goldstein
112 S.E.2d 24 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
McKenzie v. Bank of Georgia
46 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. Simmons
39 S.E.2d 166 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Saint John v. Johnson
187 S.E. 136 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Allen v. Atlanta Furniture Co.
176 S.E. 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Roberts v. Seanor
166 S.E. 375 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 863, 33 Ga. App. 501, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-snyder-gactapp-1925.