Barnes v. Rodriguez
This text of 149 A.D.2d 418 (Barnes v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the New York State Board of Parole to provide the petitioner with a new parole hearing, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), entered February 4, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 A.D.2d 418, 542 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-1989.