Barnes v. Reveley

Fourth Circuit

Barnes v. Reveley

520 F. App'x 218

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2013·No. No. 12-8098·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Barnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Reveley, No. 1:12-cv-01365-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2012). We deny Barnes’s motions to appoint counsel, to consider precedent authorities, and for damages. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Barnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Reveley, No. 1:12-cv-01365-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2012). We deny Barnes’s motions to appoint counsel, to consider precedent authorities, and for damages. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barnes v. Reveley, 520 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

520 F. App'x 218 (Barnes v. Reveley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related