Barnes v. Quattlebaum

339 F. App'x 297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2009
DocketNo. 09-6619
StatusPublished

This text of 339 F. App'x 297 (Barnes v. Quattlebaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. Quattlebaum, 339 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lewis Barnes seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Absent exceptional circumstances not present here, the denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order is interlocutory and not appealable. Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-04, 105 S.Ct. 3467, 87 L.Ed.2d 603 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon, 482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir.1973). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-quattlebaum-ca4-2009.