Barnes v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.

132 A.D.2d 921, 518 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49372
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 10, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendants are not entitled to further disclosure concerning the expected testimony of plaintiffs architect expert unless they can make a showing of special circumstances (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [ii]; Siegel, Supplementary Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, 1987 Pocket Part, CPLR C3101:29, at 10-11). Since defendants have failed to establish such special circumstances, Special Term properly granted plaintiffs motion for a protective order and vacated the notice to take the expert’s deposition. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Miller, J. — protective order.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. P & C Food Markets, Inc., 132 A.D.2d 921, 518 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

132 A.D.2d 921 (Barnes v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Repka v. Arctic Cat, Inc.
300 A.D.2d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)