Barnes v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Barnes v. New York City Housing Authority

16 Misc. 2d 670, 184 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4096

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 18, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 Misc. 2d 670 (Barnes v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. New York City Housing Authority, 16 Misc. 2d 670, 184 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4096 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

This petition under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act seeks to set aside a determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority. Petitioners claim that respondent’s across the hoard rent increase of $6 per apartment effective January 1, 1959 was arbitrary and capricious in that the increase was not based upon the standard previously used in determining rents, to wit, numbers of rooms, size of family and family income. In enacting the Public Housing Law, the Legislature did not fix any standards by which public housing rentals should be fixed but left that power exclusively with the authority. (Public Housing Law, § 154.) The local Housing Authority has not officially adopted any criteria which limits the exercise of their discretion in this field. Even had the authority adopted a firm policy in this regard nothing precludes them from changing such a policy, as long as it is consistent with the legislative intent, to provide housing at monthly rentals which low income groups can afford. Assuming the court could devise a more equitable distribution of the rent increase, it may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative authority, where as here, the discretion of respondent was not exercised in an arbitrary or capricious manner.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

This petition under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act seeks to set aside a determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority. Petitioners claim that respondent’s across the hoard rent increase of $6 per apartment effective January 1, 1959 was arbitrary and capricious in that the increase was not based upon the standard previously used in determining rents, to wit, numbers of rooms, size of family and family income. In enacting the Public Housing Law, the Legislature did not fix any standards by which public housing rentals should be fixed but left that power exclusively with the authority. (Public Housing Law, § 154.) The local Housing Authority has not officially adopted any criteria which limits the exercise of their discretion in this field. Even had the authority adopted a firm policy in this regard nothing precludes them from changing such a policy, as long as it is consistent with the legislative intent, to provide housing at monthly rentals which low income groups can afford. Assuming the court could devise a more equitable distribution of the rent increase, it may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative authority, where as here, the discretion of respondent was not exercised in an arbitrary or capricious manner.

Petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Misc. 2d 670, 184 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nysupct-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack