Barnes v. National Archives Records Administration

108 F. App'x 421
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2004
Docket03-3243
StatusUnpublished

This text of 108 F. App'x 421 (Barnes v. National Archives Records Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. National Archives Records Administration, 108 F. App'x 421 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kimberly Ann Barnes appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action brought under Title VII, the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Rehabilitation Act of 1993, and the Notification and Federal Employee Anti-Discrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002, against her employer, the United States National Archives and Records Administration. Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Winkle v. S.W. Bell Tel. Co., 195 F.3d 418, 420 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review), we affirm for the reasons explained by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steve Winkle v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
195 F.3d 418 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F. App'x 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-national-archives-records-administration-ca8-2004.