Barnes v. National Archives Records Administration

108 F. App'x 421
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2004·No. 03-3243·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kimberly Ann Barnes appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action brought under Title VII, the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Rehabilitation Act of 1993, and the Notification and Federal Employee Anti-Discrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002, against her employer, the United States National Archives and Records Administration. Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Winkle v. S.W. Bell Tel. Co., 195 F.3d 418, 420 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review), we affirm for the reasons explained by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. National Archives Records Administration, 108 F. App'x 421 (8th Cir. 2004).

108 F. App'x 421 (Barnes v. National Archives Records Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steve Winkle v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
195 F.3d 418 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)