Barnes v. Guardianship of Barnes

898 So. 2d 1185, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4627, 2005 WL 767097
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 2005·No. No. 3D04-1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the Court has jurisdiction to review the probate order on appeal, see Delgado v. Estate of Garriga, 870 So.2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. See Am. Red Cross v. Estate of Haynsworth, 708 So.2d 602, 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(adjudication of incompetency creates prima facie case against proponent of later-executed instrument rebuttable by sufficient showing of execution during “lucid interval”); 3 Fla. Jur.2d Appellate Review § 96 (2004)(failure to assert contention in trial court precludes consideration on appeal).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. Guardianship of Barnes, 898 So. 2d 1185, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4627, 2005 WL 767097 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

898 So. 2d 1185 (Barnes v. Guardianship of Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orange v. State
898 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)