Barnes v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

231 S.E.2d 569, 140 Ga. App. 515, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1544
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 19, 1976
Docket52917
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 231 S.E.2d 569 (Barnes v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 231 S.E.2d 569, 140 Ga. App. 515, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Clark, Judge.

Appellant was listed as mortgagee under a homeowners insurance policy issued by appellee to Robert E. Stroud. The policy term was designated to be for 12 months commencing on June 9, 1970 and expiring on June 9,1971. The policy provided for successive renewals upon payment of a required continuation premium. Such premium was not paid. When the insured property burned on July 4, 1974, the policy had been canceled because of the nonpayment of premiums.

After suit was filed the defendant insurer moved for summary judgment based upon the affidavit of its officer. The affidavit recited notice of the expiration of the policy for nonpayment of premium including notification to the plaintiff as mortgagee. There was a counter-affidavit by the plaintiff asserting that he had not received any notice concerning the cancellation of the policy.

This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to the defendant insurer. Held:

1. This case is controlled by Headnote 1 of Reece v. Massachusetts Fire &c. Ins. Co., 107 Ga. App. 581 (130 SE2d 782). It reads: "The policy of fire insurance having expired by its own terms and not having been canceled while in force, no duty was imposed upon the insurer to furnish any notice to the mortgagee as the named loss payee regarding the failure of the insured to exercise the *516 option of renewal or of the lapse of the policy.”

Submitted October 7, 1976 Decided November 19, 1976. Harold E. Martin, for appellant. Donald M. Fain, Michael S. Reeves, for appellee.

2. Accordingly the trial court was correct. See also Robertson v. Southland Life Ins. Co., 130 Ga. App. 807, 808 (3) (204 SE2d 505).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waco Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Jones
348 S.E.2d 547 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Haynes
293 S.E.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Transamerica Insurance v. Smith
249 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. Davis
245 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Unigard Mutual Insurance v. Fox
236 S.E.2d 851 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 S.E.2d 569, 140 Ga. App. 515, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-georgia-farm-bureau-mutual-insurance-company-gactapp-1976.