Barnes v. Fucci
This text of 563 So. 2d 175 (Barnes v. Fucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sharon L. BARNES, Appellant,
v.
Dennis Nicholas FUCCI, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
David M. Rappaport, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Shirley Kay Hart, Miami, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse. Under the facts of this case the trial court erred in failing to grant the appellant/mother's petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. While the mother was incarcerated, the father filed a motion to modify child custody and child support. The mother responded and petitioned the trial court to enter an order directing that she be transported from prison to the trial court for the purpose of attending the hearing on the father's motion *176 to modify. In our view, the mother had a due process right to be present and an opportunity to be heard at the hearing on the father's motion. See Baker v. Baker, 403 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DOWNEY, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 So. 2d 175, 1990 WL 78974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-fucci-fladistctapp-1990.