Barnes v. . Dickinson

12 N.C. 346
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1827·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hax.Ii, Judge.

It does not appear that Cooke had such an interest in the cause as to render him incompetent.

As to what Rebecca Hicks tol$ the Plaintiff, relative to her deposition, he had ample time to avail himself of it (if that could be done) on the trial ¿ he might also then have objected to her deposition, because it was in the handwriting of Cooke, if that objection would have availed him. I think the Judge did right in not granting a new trial for these reasons.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. . Dickinson, 12 N.C. 346 (N.C. 1827).

12 N.C. 346 (Barnes v. . Dickinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. . Dickinson
16 N.C. 273 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1828)
Rutledge v. Read.
3 N.C. 242 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1803)