Barnes v. . Dickinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Barnes v. . Dickinson

12 N.C. 346

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 5, 1827

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 N.C. 346 (Barnes v. . Dickinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. . Dickinson, 12 N.C. 346 (N.C. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Hax.Ii, Judge.

It does not appear that Cooke had such an interest in the cause as to render him incompetent.

As to what Rebecca Hicks tol$ the Plaintiff, relative to her deposition, he had ample time to avail himself of it (if that could be done) on the trial ¿ he might also then have objected to her deposition, because it was in the handwriting of Cooke, if that objection would have availed him. I think the Judge did right in not granting a new trial for these reasons.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hax.Ii, Judge.

It does not appear that Cooke had such an interest in the cause as to render him incompetent.

As to what Rebecca Hicks tol$ the Plaintiff, relative to her deposition, he had ample time to avail himself of it (if that could be done) on the trial ¿ he might also then have objected to her deposition, because it was in the handwriting of Cooke, if that objection would have availed him. I think the Judge did right in not granting a new trial for these reasons.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.C. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-dickinson-nc-1827.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack