Barnes v. City of West Bay City

101 N.W. 1131, 138 Mich. 93, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 797
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 1904·No. Docket No. 17·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Moore, C. J.

This action is brought to recover for injuries received by the plaintiff upon a defective sidewalk. The city offered no evidence. From a judgment obtained by the plaintiff, the case is brought here by writ of error. The sole question involved is, Do the facts show plaintiff guilty, as a matter of law, of contributory negligence ? It is claimed by the city they do, and that the case is within Irion v. City of Saginaw, 120 Mich. 295, and like cases. On the part of the plaintiff it is claimed the testimony presented a question of fact for the jury, under Styles v. Village of Decatur, 131 Mich. 443, and like cases*. The case is near the border line. It would profit no one to set out the testimony in detail. We will content ourselves with saying the testimony made a question of fact for the jury.

Judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. City of West Bay City, 101 N.W. 1131, 138 Mich. 93, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 797 (Mich. 1904).

101 N.W. 1131 (Barnes v. City of West Bay City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cloutier v. City of Owosso
72 N.W.2d 46 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1955)
Vincent v. City of Detroit
177 N.W. 239 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Wadkins v. City of Albion
166 N.W. 982 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
Sargeant v. City of Detroit
120 N.W. 792 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)