Barnes v. Champion Homebuilders Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedNovember 26, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 339547
StatusPublished

This text of Barnes v. Champion Homebuilders Co. (Barnes v. Champion Homebuilders Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. Champion Homebuilders Co., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments on appeal. The Full Commission adopts and affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which the parties entered into in the Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. The employer-employee relationship existed between the deceased employee and the defendant-employer from March 2, 1984, through April 8, 1986, and from June 23, 1986, through April 28, 1989.

3. Aetna Casualty Surety was the compensation carrier on the risk.

4. The deceased employee died of aplastic anemia on September 8, 1993.

5. At the time of his death, the deceased employee was survived by two whole dependents, his wife, Susan Marshburn, and a daughter, Ashleigh Kaitlyn Marshburn, born March 31, 1992. The parties also stipulated to the following:

1. Plaintiff's medical records, marked Stipulated Exhibit

2. Videotape deposition and transcript of deposition of the decedent Mitchell Marshburn, marked Stipulated Exhibits 3 and 4.

3. The decedent's Social Security earnings records, marked Stipulated Exhibit 5.

4. Material Safety Data Sheets provided by the defendant-employer through discovery, marked Stipulated Exhibit 6.

5. Certified OSHA inspection records pertaining to the defendant-employer, marked Stipulated Exhibit 7.

6. The decedent's death certificate, marked Stipulated Exhibit 8.

7. Marriage certificate, marked Stipulated Exhibit 9.

8. Bill for funeral expenses, marked Stipulated Exhibit 10.

9. Birth certificate of Ashleigh Kaitlyn Marshburn, marked Stipulated Exhibit 11.

10. Documentation concerning the decedent's medical bills and outstanding balances, marked Stipulated Exhibit 12.

11. Industrial Commission Forms 18, 33, and 33R, marked Stipulated Exhibit 13.

12. Statement from Dr. Joseph Moore, marked Stipulated Exhibit 14.

***********
Based upon the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following additional:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Employee Mitchell Marshburn was 32 years old when he died of aplastic anemia on September 8, 1993. At the time of his death, Mr. Marshburn was survived by his wife, Susan Marshburn, and his fifteen-month-old daughter, Ashleigh Kaitlyn Marshburn.

2. The defendant-employer was engaged in the business of manufacturing mobile homes. The plant at which Mr. Marshburn worked was a large tin building, approximately 100 feet wide by 300 feet long. The production process took place in this building in assembly-line fashion, with the homes being moved from one station to the next as the work was completed. There were two large bay doors at the front and the back of the building, which were left open during the summer and closed during the winter. The building was not air-conditioned, and in the summer the temperature inside the building was in excess of 100 degrees. There were large fans in the ceiling, approximately 50 to 60 feet above the production floor. There were also smaller fans throughout the plant to blow the air around, but no exhaust fans or hoods to vent the fumes to the outside.

3. For almost five years beginning in 1984, Mr. Marshburn was employed by the defendant-employer in the lag-down department. As a lag down employee, Mr. Marshburn was responsible for running wires, installing HVAC duct work, cutting and rolling out the insulation, spraying on the undercoating, and bolting the chassis to the floor.

4. Mr. Marshburn's job with the defendant-employer was described as the dirtiest job in the plant. He used an industrial-type spray gun to apply the undercoating, which created a thick cloud of paint and fumes. He worked directly adjacent to the station where the tile adhesive was applied with an industrial-type spray gun, and that process created a fog of fumes in his area that took his breath away. The fans in the plant were turned off when Mr. Marshburn sprayed, to keep the fumes and paint from blowing on the other workers. Mr. Marshburn was occasionally offered paper masks, but they are ineffective against chemicals and fumes, and he could not wear them anyway because within minutes of putting one on, it would become so coated with black paint that he could not breathe through it. By the end of the workday, Mr. Marshburn was covered with black paint.

5. Mr. Marshburn usually worked five days of 12-hour shifts and additionally one half-day of work per week. Twice each day, before leaving for lunch and at the end of the workday, Mr. Marshburn would clean himself up using Varsol 18, a liquid substance which he kept at his workstation in a three to five gallon open bucket to clean the nozzle of his spray gun. The Varsol was particularly effective in removing the black undercoating, so twice a day, Mr. Marshburn would dip his hands in the bucket of Varsol and rub it over his hands, arms, neck and face, to remove the black paint that covered him.

6. Within a few weeks of beginning to work at Champion, Mr. Marshburn's hands became dry and cracked. He developed deep, open cracks and fissures in his hands that remained a problem throughout his employment with the defendant-employer. He also noticed that a black substance would come out when he sneezed or blew his nose, and he began coughing up black material and eventually blood. In addition to being very fatigued while employed by the defendant-employer, he also noticed that his heart was racing, a symptom associated with exposure to benzene. Mr. Marshburn left his employment with the defendant-employer in 1989 primarily because of health concerns, and shortly thereafter these complaints resolved.

7. In 1992, while employed by Brinks as a messenger, Mr. Marshburn began feeling very fatigued. He went to see Dr. Boone, who had been treating him for an unrelated spinal cord syrinx. Dr. Boone ran an MRI, the results of which suggested metastatic disease. He referred Mr. Marshburn over to Dr. Tremont, an oncologist at Rex, who, after further testing, confirmed a diagnosis of aplastic anemia and referred him to Duke Medical Center.

8. Aplastic anemia is a disease affecting the bone marrow, similar to leukemia. In aplastic anemia, the bone marrow fails and blood counts fall. It is a serious disease, oftentimes although not invariably fatal. In approximately fifty percent of the cases, the cause of aplastic anemia is unknown. However, there are known causes which are well-documented in the literature, that include viruses, such as hepatitis C, radiation, model airplane glue, the antibiotic chloramphenicol, and exposure to chemicals, including benzene.

9. At Duke Medical Center, Mr. Marshburn came under the care of Dr. de Castro and Dr. Moore, both specialists in the field of hematology/oncology. In going over his history with the doctors, Mr. Marshburn described the exposure to chemicals while employed at the defendant-employer. Dr. de Castro and Dr. Moore considered the chemical exposure significant, and believed that it had contributed to Mr. Marshburn's development of aplastic anemia.

10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Standard Mineral Co.
469 S.E.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn
301 S.E.2d 359 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barnes v. Champion Homebuilders Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-champion-homebuilders-co-ncworkcompcom-2002.