Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Barnes v. Cathers & Dembrosky

Barnes v. Cathers & Dembrosky

5 A.D.3d 122, 771 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 A.D.3d 122 (Barnes v. Cathers & Dembrosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. Cathers & Dembrosky, 5 A.D.3d 122, 771 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered September 24, 2003, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate this action with another action pending in New York County, entitled Cathers v Barnes (Index No. 600214/02), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The two actions are at completely different stages of discovery. Consolidation would result in undue delay in the resolution of the Cathers action (see Abrams v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 1 AD3d 118 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
94 A.D.3d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Goldman v. Rosen
15 A.D.3d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 122, 771 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-cathers-dembrosky-nyappdiv-2004.