Barnes v. Barnes

68 So. 248, 109 Miss. 273
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 68 So. 248 (Barnes v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnes v. Barnes, 68 So. 248, 109 Miss. 273 (Mich. 1915).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant was administrator de bonis non of the estate of Abigail Barnes, deceased. The former administrator had sold a horse, belonging to the estate, to appellee. The note representing the agreed price of the horse was taken payable to the administrator individually. When this note was offered in evidence, [275]*275defendant objected, because it was alleged that the sale of the horse by administrator was void. This objection was sustained by the court. Plaintiff asked leave to amend the-cause of action so as to sue for the value of the horse. Defendant’s objection to this amendment was sustained. We think the amendment should have been allowed. Bohannon v. Fulton, 31 Miss. 348; Martin v. Tarver, 43 Miss. 517; Duff v. Snider, 54 Miss. 245; Noble v. Terrell, 64 Miss. 830, 2 So. 14.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Tarver
43 Miss. 517 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1871)
Duff v. Snider
54 Miss. 245 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1876)
Noble v. Terrell
64 Miss. 830 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1887)
Bohannon v. Fulton
31 Miss. 348 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 So. 248, 109 Miss. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-barnes-miss-1915.