Barnes v. Barker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Barnes v. Barker

226 N.W. 958, 119 Neb. 838, 1929 Neb. LEXIS 11

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 1929·No. No. 26781·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is- an action upon a contract for the sale of real estate whereby plaintiffs seek a foreclosure of the contract as a mortgage. Defendant prayed for specific performance and for damages occasioned by the breach thereof. From [839]*839the judgment of the district court of Box Butte county defendant Earl C. Barker has appealed and plaintiffs have prosecuted a cross-appeal.

We have carefully considered the alleged errors assigned both on the appeal and the cross-appeal. We find the record to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is- an action upon a contract for the sale of real estate whereby plaintiffs seek a foreclosure of the contract as a mortgage. Defendant prayed for specific performance and for damages occasioned by the breach thereof. From [839]*839the judgment of the district court of Box Butte county defendant Earl C. Barker has appealed and plaintiffs have prosecuted a cross-appeal.

We have carefully considered the alleged errors assigned both on the appeal and the cross-appeal. We find the record to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Barnes v. Barker, 226 N.W. 958, 119 Neb. 838, 1929 Neb. LEXIS 11 (Neb. 1929).

Pincite

226 N.W. 958 (Barnes v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.