Barnard v. Whiting

7 Mass. 358
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The last count is clearly bad. A general count of indebitatus assumpsit, for money had and received, must be for cash ; but here it is for bank bills. Judgment cannot be rendered on this count.

Whitman and J. Richardson for the defendants. Williams and Bigelow for the plaintiff.

But the judge, who sat at the trial, has certified to us that all the counts in the declaration were, in fact, for one and the same cause of action. He might have directed a verdict upon such count as the evidence applied to. And, although he did not do this, the plaintiff may yet amend his verdict, by taking it on either of the counts, upon this certificate of the judge, notwithstanding it is not of the same term.

The verdict was accordingly so amended as to find for the plaintiff upon one count only; and judgment was entered upon it so amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnard v. Whiting, 7 Mass. 358 (Mass. 1811).

7 Mass. 358 (Barnard v. Whiting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minot v. City of Boston
86 N.E. 783 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Weston v. Gilmore
63 Me. 493 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1874)
Small v. Rogers
46 N.H. 176 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1865)
Aldrich v. Lyman
6 R.I. 98 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1859)
McDaniel v. Parks
19 Ark. 671 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1858)
Pitts v. Farnum
62 Mass. 41 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1851)
Evans v. Rogers
1 Ga. 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1846)
Fenwick v. Grimes
8 F. Cas. 1142 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838)
Waterbury v. Inhabitants of Darien
9 Conn. 260 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1832)
McLellan v. Crofton
6 Me. 307 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1830)
Clark v. Lamb
25 Mass. 415 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1830)
Sheldon v. Welles
21 Mass. 60 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1826)
Patten v. Gurney
17 Mass. 182 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1821)
Sullivan v. Holker
15 Mass. 374 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)
Barnes v. Hurd
11 Mass. 57 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)
Kingsley v. Bill
9 Mass. 197 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1812)
Commonwealth v. Coombs
2 Mass. 489 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)
Benson v. Swift
2 Mass. 50 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1806)