Barnard v. Wallace
This text of 1943 OK 26 (Barnard v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following trial and judgment for interveners, Izora Alexander Lee et al., the defendants unsuccessfully sought new trial and then appealed to this court.
On the 25th day of January, 1943, there is filed and presented in this court a, confession of error signed on behalf of all interested parties and presented upon appearance of their attorneys.
In such case we have held that we will examine the record, and where the allegations of error appear to be sustained, the confession of error will be taken as true. See O’Dell v. Sharp, 182 Okla. 534, 78 P. 2d 810, and Bradshaw v. Myers, decided November 24, 1942, 191 Okla. 506, 131 P. 2d 79.
This cause is therefore reversed, and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment heretofore rendered in that court, and release the sureties and principals on the super-sedeas bond.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1943 OK 26, 133 P.2d 542, 192 Okla. 27, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-wallace-okla-1943.