Barnard v. Wallace

1943 OK 26, 133 P.2d 542, 192 Okla. 27, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 66
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 26, 1943·No. No. 30923.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following trial and judgment for interveners, Izora Alexander Lee et al., the defendants unsuccessfully sought new trial and then appealed to this court.

On the 25th day of January, 1943, there is filed and presented in this court a, confession of error signed on behalf of all interested parties and presented upon appearance of their attorneys.

In such case we have held that we will examine the record, and where the allegations of error appear to be sustained, the confession of error will be taken as true. See O’Dell v. Sharp, 182 Okla. 534, 78 P. 2d 810, and Bradshaw v. Myers, decided November 24, 1942, 191 Okla. 506, 131 P. 2d 79.

This cause is therefore reversed, and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment heretofore rendered in that court, and release the sureties and principals on the super-sedeas bond.

CORN, C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVI-SON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V. C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnard v. Wallace, 1943 OK 26, 133 P.2d 542, 192 Okla. 27, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 66 (Okla. 1943).

1943 OK 26 (Barnard v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Murray
1946 OK 3 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)