Barnard v. State

906 So. 2d 1108, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5121, 2005 WL 840837
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 2005
DocketNo. 3D04-2892
StatusPublished

This text of 906 So. 2d 1108 (Barnard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnard v. State, 906 So. 2d 1108, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5121, 2005 WL 840837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm finding that the trial court properly summarily denied the appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus where he failed to exhaust all of his administrative remedies. Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hidalgo v. State
729 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
906 So. 2d 1108, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5121, 2005 WL 840837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.