Barnard v. State
This text of 691 So. 2d 592 (Barnard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand the case with instructions to correct several clerical errors in the written sentencing papers. The sentence of 165 months for grand theft in case number 95-2541 should be corrected to reflect that it was a sentence of five years as indicated by the trial court during the sentencing hearing. The sentencing papers must also be corrected so that the state’s agreement to nol pros two of the cases is applied to the right cases and to correctly identify the case that was to be the subject of the court’s order to pay restitution.
Affirmed but remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 So. 2d 592, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3910, 1997 WL 178907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.