Barnard v. Peck
16 Ind. 81, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 19
Opinion
Suit on note, and to reform and foreclose a mortgage.
The only questions presented by the brief of the appellants are, that the Court erred in overruling a demurrer to the complaint, and in refusing to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
As to the first point, the note and mortgage were filed with the complaint and sufficiently referred to therein. Ellis v. Miller, 9 Ind. 210.
As to the second, it is settled in Toner v. Mitchell, 13 Ind. 530.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnard v. Peck, 16 Ind. 81, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 19 (Ind. 1861).
16 Ind. 81 (Barnard v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. Miller
9 Ind. 210 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1857)
Toner v. Mitchell
13 Ind. 530 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)