Barnard v. Peck
This text of 16 Ind. 81 (Barnard v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit on note, and to reform and foreclose a mortgage.
The only questions presented by the brief of the appellants are, that the Court erred in overruling a demurrer to the complaint, and in refusing to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
As to the first point, the note and mortgage were filed with the complaint and sufficiently referred to therein. Ellis v. Miller, 9 Ind. 210.
As to the second, it is settled in Toner v. Mitchell, 13 Ind. 530.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 81, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-peck-ind-1861.